Neural Network: The Technology That Decides Who You Are (Without Knowing You)

What is a neural network

Every time you unlock your phone with your face, type a message and the keyboard suggests the next word, or scroll TikTok and the next video is exactly what you wanted, you’re interacting with a neural network. Neural networks are not magic: they’re mathematics that imitate (poorly) how the human brain works — and turn prediction into infrastructure.

What Happens When Machines Learn

The crucial difference between a traditional program and a neural network? The first executes orders. The second learns by itself by observing examples. Millions of examples. Sometimes billions.

Imagine teaching a child what a dog is. You don’t give them a checklist (“four legs, tail, barks”). You show them a hundred different dogs, and they infer the pattern. Neural networks work like that: they observe, fail, correct, repeat — until the error becomes statistically negligible.

The problem? What they “learn” depends entirely on who chose the examples. And what they decided to exclude.

How Neural network Works: The Architecture of Learning

A neural network is a chain of computations organized into layers. Each layer transforms data and passes it to the next. Think of an assembly line: every worker inspects a tiny detail and hands it forward. Nobody has the full picture. Yet an entire car comes out.

  • Input Layer – Raw data enters: pixels, words, numbers. The network doesn’t “see” a cat or “read” a sentence: it sees numbers.
  • Hidden Layers – Where everything happens. Each neuron (a mathematical function) combines signals with weights and decides whether to activate. Weights are the core: they define what matters and what gets ignored.
  • Output Layer – The final verdict: not certainty, but probability (“94%”, “78%”).

Training: how the machine “gets it”

Take a brand-new network: its weights are random. It’s dumb. Show it a cat image and ask: “What do you see?” It answers at random. You correct it. The error generates a signal that flows backward through all layers (backpropagation), slightly adjusting every weight. Repeat that a million times.

In the end, the network doesn’t “know” what a cat is. But it can recognize which pixel configurations tend to appear when humans say “cat.” It’s a perfect simulation of understanding. It is not understanding.

Neural networks and algorithmic control: a symbolic image of prediction shaping identity and behavior.
Neural networks don’t “know” you: they reconstruct you as a probabilistic profile — then treat that profile as if it were you.

Neural network: From Hype to Oblivion to Total Dominance

1943–1958: The promise. McCulloch and Pitts formalize a neuron as a mathematical object. Rosenblatt builds the Perceptron: a machine that learns by changing itself through error.

1969: The crash. Minsky and Papert expose deep limits of single-layer perceptrons (XOR becomes the symbolic wound). The first “AI winter” arrives: funding collapses, research freezes.

1986: The quiet resurrection. Rumelhart, Hinton, and Williams turn backpropagation into a practical lever: when the network fails, the error flows backward and updates weights. Depth becomes feasible, but compute is still insufficient.

2012: The break. AlexNet wins ImageNet and rewrites the field: GPUs, data, brutal parallelism. From then on: an arms race. Bigger models, bigger budgets, bigger infrastructure. AI becomes critical infrastructure — and therefore political.

Translation of 2012: whoever controls datasets, GPUs, and the biggest models controls what becomes “true,” “relevant,” “credible.”

Translation of 2017 onward: with Transformers, language itself becomes an industrial extraction surface.

Tokenization & Embeddings: How Machines “Read” (Without Reading)

Machines don’t read. They don’t know what “cat” or “freedom” means. For them, “home” is indistinguishable from “%&$#” until we turn language into something they can process: numbers. That happens in two steps: tokenization and embeddings.

Step 1: Tokenization — breaking language into pieces

Tokenization splits text into discrete units called tokens. It sounds neutral, but it isn’t: what counts as a “unit” is a choice, and choices create winners and losers in representation.

Word tokenization (basic):

["The", "cat", "runs", "fast", "."]

Subword tokenization (modern): BPE / WordPiece / SentencePiece split into sub-parts based on statistical frequency.

["Un", "##believ", "##ably"]

Each token gets an ID:

"The cat runs"
↓
["The", "cat", "runs"]
↓
[104, 2501, 892]

Here’s the critical point: tokenization destroys meaning. It reduces language to indexes. To rebuild relationships, you need step 2.

Step 2: Embeddings — the geography of meaning

An ID is useless to a neural network. An embedding turns the ID into a vector (hundreds or thousands of numbers) placing the token in a geometric space: geometric distance ≈ semantic distance. This emerges from the distributional idea: words used in similar contexts end up represented as “close.”

Neural network: The political problem of embeddings

If the semantic space comes from data, it inherits the data’s biases. Bias isn’t an accident: it’s a consequence. When embeddings feed CV filters, scoring, ranking, moderation, and recommendation, statistical prejudice becomes structural discrimination. No “evil.” Just mathematics crystallizing the culture that produced it.

The Three Architectures That Run the Digital World

CNN: Artificial eyes

Convolutional Neural Networks dominate images and video. They scan patterns in windows: edges → shapes → parts → faces. They power tagging, surveillance, medical imaging, and autonomous driving perception.

RNN: Fragile memory

Recurrent Neural Networks handle sequences (text, speech, time). They have memory — but limited. Long-range context fades. They dominated before Transformers.

Transformer: The coup

2017: “Attention Is All You Need.” Transformers look at the whole sequence and decide what to “attend” to. They scale in size and performance — and shift power toward whoever can afford parameters, data, GPUs, and datacenters.

LLMs: When Text Becomes Industrial

Large Language Models are massive Transformers trained on huge amounts of text. When they answer, they don’t “understand”: they compute the most likely next token given context. Fluency ≠ comprehension: it’s statistical eloquence.

The marginal cost of generating text collapses toward zero. But power moves elsewhere: to curation, verification, context — or toward collapse, in an ecosystem where content is infinite and attention is the only scarce commodity.

The Hidden Costs Nobody Tells You About

1) Bias is mathematical, not accidental

If training data associates “nurse” with female pronouns and “surgeon” with male pronouns, the model will reproduce that pattern. Not because it “believes” it — because it optimizes statistical fidelity. AI cannot be neutral: it is an extraction of data.

2) Energy and impact

Training large models consumes substantial energy. And it’s not just training: daily inference at massive scale matters too. AI’s footprint grows with the race to bigger models.

3) The oligopoly of knowledge

Frontier neural networks require industrial scale: scarce GPUs, enormous capital, huge datacenters. Result: the cognitive infrastructure of the future concentrates into a few actors. Everyone else consumes.

4) The black box and the impossible appeal

With hundreds of billions of parameters, “explaining” a decision is not just hard — often impractical. When these systems shape credit, jobs, and security, opacity becomes a constitutional problem.

Where You Meet Them (Even When You Don’t Know)

  • FaceID / face unlock: CNNs comparing your face to a stored template
  • Keyboard suggestions: models predicting the next word
  • Social feeds: networks estimating what will keep you scrolling
  • Search and ranking: models rewriting queries, suggesting, answering
  • Dynamic pricing: systems predicting what you’ll pay right now
  • Scoring and credit: models deciding whether you’re “trustworthy”
  • Content moderation: automated classification on text/images
  • E-commerce recommendations: predicting purchases before choice
  • Algorithmic trading: millisecond decisions moving capital
  • Imaging diagnostics: CNNs reading scans and X-rays

The Question That Remains

Neural networks revealed that many tasks we called “human intelligence” are, in part, statistical pattern recognition. Writing, translating, diagnosing, predicting, classifying: industrializable through example and repetition.

That forces an uncomfortable question: if an algorithm can predict your choices with unsettling accuracy, how free were those choices? Understanding how these technologies work is no longer optional. It’s intellectual self-defense in a world where invisible algorithms decide what you see, what you read, who you are.

Neural networks aren’t replacing you. They’re shaping you.

Neural network sources

SEO keywords: neural networks, reti neurali, artificial neural networks, deep learning, tokenization, word embeddings, transformer architecture, LLMs, algorithmic bias, predictive algorithms.

READ MORE

Similar Posts